We are a small office, usually around 10 people. I would be very interested in hearing your thoughts on this.

As result, I am thinking about shifting away from 'digital tools' proficiency altogether and spending this time to improve on more core architectural skills instead, like design ability. Essentially, I think that I might already know enough software, so perhaps it is not wise to learn another package. On the other hand, I can't help but think that learning Rhino very well could only place me in the equivalent '3D Rhino intern' position, as opposed to the 'Revit intern' position that I had before. I am also curious as to whether there are practices that combine Rhino & Revit, so whether the combination of the two could place me in a desirable position. Finally, knowing one more software package could make me more versatile. Therefore, I am wondering if knowing Rhino could help me get into a more 'designer' related professional path, as opposed to the technical path associated with Revit use. It seems that this is a programme used a lot for design, as opposed to Revit which is mainly used for documentation. On the one hand, many large practices are asking for Rhino & Grasshopper. Given my Revit proficiency, I was wondering if learning Rhino at this stage would add any value to my CV. I already know Revit and have used it in professional practice in quite advanced level (shared parameters, adaptive components etc.) I am currently in graduate school and have been thinking about expanding my software skillset.

3d people rhino